Aruki: /* Necessary? */

2015-01-30T02:13:09Z

‎Necessary?

Embyr 75: Created page with "==Necessary?== Is this template really necessary? There are a lot of other ways to denote that a file type is documented; for example, by tagging a Category on the article, or..."

2015-01-30T01:09:17Z

Created page with "==Necessary?== Is this template really necessary? There are a lot of other ways to denote that a file type is documented; for example, by tagging a Category on the article, or..."

New page

==Necessary?==
Is this template really necessary? There are a lot of other ways to denote that a file type is documented; for example, by tagging a Category on the article, or by creating a parameter in the infoboxes I'm assuming we'll eventually use that indicates whether the file type is fully documented or not. Having a notice template on every single page seems kind of unnecessary to me, which the proliferation of this template would eventually cause. Any thoughts? [[User:Embyr 75|Embyr 75]] ([[User talk:Embyr 75|talk]]) 19:09, 29 January 2015 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 30 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Necessary?==		==Necessary?==
	Is this template really necessary? There are a lot of other ways to denote that a file type is documented; for example, by tagging a Category on the article, or by creating a parameter in the infoboxes I'm assuming we'll eventually use that indicates whether the file type is fully documented or not. Having a notice template on every single page seems kind of unnecessary to me, which the proliferation of this template would eventually cause. Any thoughts? [[User:Embyr 75\|Embyr 75]] ([[User talk:Embyr 75\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 January 2015 (CST)		Is this template really necessary? There are a lot of other ways to denote that a file type is documented; for example, by tagging a Category on the article, or by creating a parameter in the infoboxes I'm assuming we'll eventually use that indicates whether the file type is fully documented or not. Having a notice template on every single page seems kind of unnecessary to me, which the proliferation of this template would eventually cause. Any thoughts? [[User:Embyr 75\|Embyr 75]] ([[User talk:Embyr 75\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 January 2015 (CST)
		+
		+	:yeah, I agree. This template is not used on any pages. It used to be on the DSP page, but I removed it. This is pretty much just a leftover from when MrSinistar was kicking around ideas about how the research notice boxes should work... I did talk with him about it a little while ago and I think we're all in agreement it's unnecessary. It might be good to have a category for fully documented formats tho. --[[User:Parax0\|Parax0]] ([[User talk:Parax0\|talk]]) 20:13, 29 January 2015 (CST)

Template talk:Filedone - Revision history

Aruki: /* Necessary? */

Embyr 75: Created page with "==Necessary?== Is this template really necessary? There are a lot of other ways to denote that a file type is documented; for example, by tagging a Category on the article, or..."